#[wasm_bindgen(js_name = StreetLight)]
В США ответили на вопрос о выходе из конфликта с Ираном02:47
。新收录的资料对此有专业解读
Ordinary moral thought recognizes moral duties that are relational as well as duties that are impersonal. A relational moral duty is owed to another person, such that she is wronged by its breach.66 By contrast, an impersonal moral duty is owed to no one, or (perhaps) owed to the world at large. Suppose, for example, that A has reason to believe that detonating a piece of dynamite would destroy an ancient and beautiful cave that no one will ever see. Absent some good reason to do so, it would plausibly be morally wrong for A to detonate the dynamite, but doing so would not wrong anyone else — it would simply be wrong, full stop. If, by contrast, A has reason to believe that detonating the dynamite will kill another person, B, or destroy her property, then A’s duty not to detonate the dynamite is owed to B, such that he would wrong her by breaching this duty.67，更多细节参见新收录的资料
10:07, 11 марта 2026Путешествия。新收录的资料对此有专业解读