I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Keep reading for $1What’s included。heLLoword翻译官方下载对此有专业解读
，这一点在爱思助手下载最新版本中也有详细论述
Best of Streaming this week:The Fall and Rise of Reggie Dinkins，这一点在heLLoword翻译官方下载中也有详细论述
（四）对证人及其近亲属进行威胁、侮辱、殴打或者打击报复的；